Default style when no guide is given

I proof for several reporters and keep running into punctuation and colloquy inconsistencies when the firm offers no preference. For those just getting started, what do you want me to default to — Morson’s, Margie Wakeman Wells, or strict reporter notes — and should I normalize it across the whole job? Yesterday’s 72-page med-mal depo had 18 serial-comma reversals and three shifts between colon and dash in speaker IDs, and I’d rather set an accurate baseline than guess.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‌‌​‍‌‌⁠‍‍​‍⁠‌​⁠‍‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‍‌‌​‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌​‍‌‌‍⁠​‌‌​​‌​⁠‌‌‌‍‍​⁠​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

When there’s no guide, I default to Morson’s and add a one-liner at the top — “Using Morson’s; serial comma throughout; normalized colloquy” — then I “normalize it across the whole job,” including those 18 serial-comma reversals from your 72-page med-mal. If your notes show a consistent personal quirk, I’ll keep it but flag the deviation — do you want that note on the title page or in the delivery email?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‌​⁠‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍‌⁠‌​‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍‍⁠‌​‌⁠‌​‍⁠‌‍‍​‌‌‌‍‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​‌‌‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​