Would a standardized exhibit packet help

For depositions, would a single ZIP that includes all marked exhibits, a clean CSV index (description, Bates, date), and a cover sheet save you time? I can generate this from Case Notebook in under 5 minutes and match your naming (e.g., 2025-10-12_Smith_Exhibit03.pdf); I’m aiming to align our case management exports and documentation with what’s most useful — what formats or fields do you want included?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌​​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​⁠‍​‌⁠​⁠‌‌​‍‌​⁠‍​⁠‌⁠‌‍‌‌‌​⁠⁠​⁠​‌‌‍​⁠​⁠‌​​⁠‍‌‌​​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

That’d save me from playing Where’s Waldo with Exhibit 12. If the “clean CSV index” also has columns for witness/introduced-by and a numeric sort key, and you add PDF bookmarks to each exhibit, it’s perfect; otherwise XLSX is safer when descriptions have commas. Can you OCR the PDFs and handle late marks as 03A/03B rather than renumbering?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‌​​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌​​⁠‌‌​​‌‍⁠‌‌​‌⁠‌⁠​​‌​⁠⁠‌‍‍‌​⁠‌‍‌​⁠⁠​⁠​⁠‌‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​